Rugby World Cup Findings Are Black And White
An independent study conducted by Performance Research Europe at the 1999 IRB Rugby World Cup found that this year’s sponsors failed to fully convert positive feelings into sponsorship recall.
On-site sponsorship activity at the Rugby World Cup was low, inconsistent, and unimaginative, with an over reliance on stadium signage to generate sponsorship awareness. So did any of the sponsors actually stand out?
Guinness was the only sponsor who managed to take advantage of their official sponsorship position with more than half of the fans reporting them to be involved with the Rugby World Cup. This left other sponsors, including Coca-Cola (26%) and BT (21%) in their wake.
Similarly, when asked to identify tournament sponsors from a list, almost all the fans (94%) were able to report Guinness, which was again head and shoulders above other official sponsors, including Coca-Cola, BT, and South African Airways all identified by less than 7 out of 10 fans.
When so many fans struggled to recall the sponsors of this tournament, it is hardly surprising that the majority (53%) of fans were unable to remember any sponsors involved with previous Rugby World Cup tournaments. Coca-Cola (sponsors of the 1997 tournament) was the most frequently mentioned previous sponsor but was recalled by less than 1 out of 10 of the fans.
With so little advertising present on-site, it is no surprise that nearly three quarters of the fans reported the level of commercialism at this tournament to be acceptable.
So, is there any good news for sponsors? Clearly so. The vast majority of Rugby World Cup attendees agreed that sponsorship benefits rugby (92%) and was appropriate at the World Cup (84%). Moreover, the majority of fans felt more positive towards sponsors (63%), believed they were more innovative than non-sponsoring companies (62%), and appreciated them more because of their involvement (62%).
Currently, sponsors are not fully benefiting from the positive feelings of the rugby fans. According to Mark Knight, Project Manager, Performance Research Europe “Until a sponsor develops a relationship with the fans that effectively communicates the benefits of the sponsorship to both the individual and their sport, the opportunity to develop brand-loyal consumers through sponsorship will be missed”.
Staff from Performance Research Europe randomly intercepted and interviewed in person, a total of four hundred and twenty three (423) attendees at four venues during the 1999 IRB Rugby World Cup. The margin of error for this sample is no more than 4%.
Full List of Independent Studies
Consumer attitudes to the oil giant and its marketing
Study of Olympic sponsorship (Albertville)
Study of Olympic sponsorship (Barcelona)
Study of Olympic sponsorship (Lillehammer)
Racestat: a comprehensive analysis of the NASCAR audience
Indy Car Study
America’s Cup sponsorship
Study of Olympic sponsorship (Atlanta)
ESPN X-Games audience study
Consumer attitudes toward corporate sponsorship of the arts
Consumer attitudes to the Olympics following Salt Lake City Scandal
Research at the Daytona 500
Study of sponsorship at the Indianapolis US Formula One Grand Prix
Study of Olympic sponsorship at Sydney
A look at how visitors connect to the commercial clutter of Times Square.
Study of Olympic sponsorship at Vancouver
The latest report.
NASCAR Winston 500
Consumer reaction to sponsorship of arenas and stadiums
Study explores attitudes to corporate sponsorship among Poles.
Research at the Rugby World Cup
Research among European Formula 1 Grand Prix
Millennium Dome sponsorship awareness study
Research at the British F1 Grand Prix
Attitudes of F1 racing fans to the introduction of US motorsports in Britain
Research into sponsorship effectiveness at Euro
UK cricket sponsorship – beyond awareness
Compares and contrasts opinions of visitors to both the 2000 US and 2000 British Formula One Grand Prix.