Independent Studies
Study:
At the Olympics, Less May Be More
Critics have always charged that the Olympics are more about marketing and less about sport, but a survey of fans attending the Sydney 2000 Games has found that subdued commercialism does not necessarily mean diminished sponsorship results.
While previous Summer Olympic Games have been critiqued for over-the top marketing and a carnival-like atmosphere, organisers of Sydney 2000 were determined that the Olympic stage should be more than just another advertising medium deluging Olympic fans. Their efforts appear to be successful: A Performance Research study of visitors to the Sydney Olympics revealed that only 20% reported the Games to be “Over-commercialised”- a steep drop from the 1996 Atlanta Games, where 40% of attendees cried “Over-commercialisation”.
But does subdued commercialism mean weaker impact? The results may indicate the opposite. When looking at returning worldwide sponsors McDonald?s, Kodak, Nike, IBM, UPS, and Visa, each one recorded higher spontaneous recall figures in Sydney than they did in Atlanta. The most extreme lifts were noted for McDonald?s (35% spontaneous recall in Sydney/ 9% in Atlanta), IBM (21% Sydney / 9% Atlanta), and Visa (16% in Sydney / 8% in Atlanta). The only exception to this trend was Coca-Cola, however considering their headquarters are in Atlanta, a drop in sponsorship awareness would be expected.
Do low key sponsorships create a sense of indifference? Apparently not. An impressive majority of Sydney 2000 attendees reported that they are “All for companies spending millions of dollars so they can be official sponsors”, and one-third (34%) indicated that “Sponsorship makes a valuable contribution to the Olympics and makes me feel better about sponsors”.
According to Kathy Wilson, Senior Project Manager at Performance Research, “There is an important difference between sponsors who simply create ?noise? with the Olympics and those who create ?meaning?. The Sydney Olympics offered a unique environment for sponsors to add value to the fan experience. This ?added value?, not loud advertising, is what ultimately encourages fans to notice and support sponsors.”
Editorial Information
*This independent study is intended to provide a “snapshot” of Olympic sponsorship. Typically, proprietary research conducted by Performance Research is designed to look beyond “snapshot” data by measuring the incremental impact of a sponsorship programme on the specific objectives of the sponsor.
Staff from Performance Research Europe randomly intercepted and interviewed in person, two hundred (200) attendees during the 2000 Summer Olympic Games, in Sydney, Australia. The margin of error is no more than 5%.
Comprehensive colour research reports covering the 2000 Sydney Olympics are available for purchase.
Full List of Independent Studies
Consumer attitudes to the oil giant and its marketing
Study of Olympic sponsorship (Albertville)
Study of Olympic sponsorship (Barcelona)
Study of Olympic sponsorship (Lillehammer)
Racestat: a comprehensive analysis of the NASCAR audience
Indy Car Study
America’s Cup sponsorship
Study of Olympic sponsorship (Atlanta)
ESPN X-Games audience study
Consumer attitudes toward corporate sponsorship of the arts
Consumer attitudes to the Olympics following Salt Lake City Scandal
Research at the Daytona 500
America’s Cup
Study of sponsorship at the Indianapolis US Formula One Grand Prix
Study of Olympic sponsorship at Sydney
A look at how visitors connect to the commercial clutter of Times Square.
Study of Olympic sponsorship at Vancouver
The latest report.
NASCAR Winston 500
Consumer reaction to sponsorship of arenas and stadiums
Study explores attitudes to corporate sponsorship among Poles.
Research at the Rugby World Cup
Research among European Formula 1 Grand Prix
Millennium Dome sponsorship awareness study
Research at the British F1 Grand Prix
Attitudes of F1 racing fans to the introduction of US motorsports in Britain
Research into sponsorship effectiveness at Euro
UK cricket sponsorship – beyond awareness
Compares and contrasts opinions of visitors to both the 2000 US and 2000 British Formula One Grand Prix.